sloth: be at rain forrest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rain forrest 1.00
be at forrest 0.90
be at rain forest 0.87
be at tropical rain forest 0.84
sense rain 0.82
be at rainforest of south america 0.77
be at costa rican forest 0.76
be at tree in south america 0.75
be at tree in rainforest 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at forrest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at costa rican forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lizard, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at forrest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(monkey, be at costa rican forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at costa rican forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in south america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in south america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in south america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in south america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lizard, be at forrest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(monkey, be at costa rican forest)