sloth: be at rainforest of south america

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rainforest of south america 1.00
be at jungle of south america 0.92
be at rainforest 0.88
be at tree in south america 0.88
be at south american jungle 0.88
be at south america 0.88
be at north america 0.88
be at tropical rainforest 0.86
be at tree in rainforest 0.86
be at amazon rainforest 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at north america)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(animal, be at north america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at north america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at south america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at north america)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(monkey, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at south america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in south america)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at jungle of south america)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in south america)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at south american jungle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at south american jungle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at jungle of south america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in south america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(sloth, be at jungle of south america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sloth, be at jungle of south america)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(sloth, be at south american jungle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sloth, be at south american jungle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in south america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, be at north america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(monkey, be at south america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, be at north america)