sloth: be at tree in rainforest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tree in rainforest 1.00
be at rainforest 0.95
be at tropical rainforest 0.92
be at tree in jungle 0.89
be at jungle tree 0.89
be at tropical forest 0.86
be at rainforest of south america 0.86
be at amazon rainforest 0.86
be at forest canopy 0.85
be at tree 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tree)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monkey, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tree)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)