slush: has quality joke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.46
, hazard
Weight: 0.39
, thing
Weight: 0.37
, dessert
Weight: 0.37
, condition
Weight: 0.36
Siblings mountain dew
Weight: 0.30
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.30
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.29
, drinking water
Weight: 0.29
, cola
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality joke 1.00
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(slush, has quality joke)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(slush, has quality joke)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(slush, has quality joke)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(slush, has quality joke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(mountain dew, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(slush, has quality joke)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(slush, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(slush, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(slush, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(slush, has quality joke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cola, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mountain dew, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(slush, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)