small arm: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arm
Weight: 0.65
, weapon
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.58
, project
Weight: 0.56
Siblings hand grenade
Weight: 0.68
, rocket launcher
Weight: 0.65
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.60
, mortar
Weight: 0.58
, rifle
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state concern 0.84
is problem globally 0.79
is issue 0.78
has state states 0.77
has state sore 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(device, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(small arm, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(device, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(device, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(device, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(small arm, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(small arm, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(small arm, is problem globally)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(small arm, is problem globally)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(small arm, is problem globally)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(small arm, is problem globally)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(small arm, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(small arm, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(small arm, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, has state problem)