small dog: be as smart as dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.81
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.72
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.66
, breed
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dachshund
Weight: 0.72
, terrier
Weight: 0.69
, pug
Weight: 0.64
, poodle
Weight: 0.64
, maltese
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as smart as dogs 1.00
be as smart as big dogs 0.98
be better than big dogs 0.84
be more aggressive than big dogs 0.83
be better than dogs 0.83
be more aggressive than dogs 0.82
bark more than big dogs 0.80
bark at big dogs 0.79
fight big dogs 0.79
attack big dogs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(small dog, be as smart as big dogs)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(small dog, be as smart as big dogs)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as big dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(small dog, be as smart as big dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(small dog, be better than big dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(small dog, be more aggressive than big dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(small dog, be better than big dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(small dog, be more aggressive than big dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be more aggressive than big dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be better than big dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(small dog, be better than dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(small dog, be better than big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(small dog, bark at big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(small dog, bark at big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(small dog, be more aggressive than dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark at big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(small dog, fight big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(small dog, be more aggressive than big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(small dog, fight big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(small dog, attack big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(small dog, attack big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(small dog, fight big dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(small dog, attack big dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(small dog, bark at big dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(small dog, be better than dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(small dog, attack big dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(small dog, fight big dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(small dog, be better than dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(small dog, be more aggressive than dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(small dog, be more aggressive than dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be more aggressive than dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be better than dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be as smart as dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(small dog, be as smart as dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(small dog, be as smart as dogs)