small dog: be at big litter

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.81
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.72
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.66
, breed
Weight: 0.65
Siblings terrier
Weight: 0.69
, police dog
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.41
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.40
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at big litter 1.00
be at litter 0.96
has litter 0.95
has baby in litter 0.91
be at litter of puppy 0.89
has litter of offspring 0.87
be at trash 0.80
be at big city 0.76
be at big dog mouth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(small dog, be at big litter)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at litter)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(small dog, be at litter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at litter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(small dog, be at litter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(small dog, be at big city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at big city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(small dog, be at big dog mouth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(small dog, be at big dog mouth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(small dog, be at big city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at big dog mouth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at big city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at big dog mouth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at big litter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(small dog, be at big litter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(small dog, be at big litter)