small dog: have teeth problems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.81
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.72
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.66
, breed
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dachshund
Weight: 0.72
, terrier
Weight: 0.69
, pug
Weight: 0.64
, poodle
Weight: 0.64
, maltese
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have teeth problems 1.00
have bad teeth 0.90
get bad teeth 0.89
get teeth 0.88
have problems 0.87
has physical part teeth 0.86
lose teeth 0.85
have dental problems 0.84
lick dogs teeth 0.80
lick bigger dogs teeth 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chihuahua, have bad teeth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, have bad teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, have bad teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have bad teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chihuahua, have bad teeth)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dachshund, have bad teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dachshund, have bad teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(small dog, have bad teeth)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(small dog, get teeth)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(small dog, get teeth)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(small dog, get bad teeth)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(small dog, have bad teeth)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have bad teeth)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(small dog, has physical part teeth)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(small dog, get teeth)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(small dog, have problems)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(small dog, have bad teeth)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(small dog, has physical part teeth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(small dog, lose teeth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(small dog, have dental problems)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(small dog, has physical part teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(small dog, get bad teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(small dog, get bad teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(small dog, lick bigger dogs teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(small dog, lick bigger dogs teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(small dog, have problems)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(small dog, lick bigger dogs teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(small dog, have problems)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(small dog, lick dogs teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(small dog, get bad teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(small dog, lick bigger dogs teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(small dog, lose teeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have dental problems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(small dog, have dental problems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(small dog, lose teeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(small dog, lose teeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(small dog, have dental problems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(small dog, lick dogs teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(small dog, lick dogs teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have problems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(small dog, get teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(small dog, has physical part teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(small dog, lick dogs teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chihuahua, have bad teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dachshund, have bad teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(small dog, have teeth problems)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chihuahua, have bad teeth)