small dog: is harder

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.81
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.72
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.66
, breed
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dachshund
Weight: 0.72
, terrier
Weight: 0.69
, pug
Weight: 0.64
, poodle
Weight: 0.64
, maltese
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harder 1.00
is hard 0.84
is difficult 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dachshund, is hard)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(small dog, is harder)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(small dog, is hard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(small dog, is difficult)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(small dog, is hard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(small dog, is difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(small dog, is hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(small dog, is difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(small dog, is hard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(small dog, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(small dog, is harder)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(small dog, is harder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(small dog, is harder)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dachshund, is hard)