small intestine: be adapted for digestion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.71
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.68
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.68
, large intestine
Weight: 0.65
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.67
, ileum
Weight: 0.47
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted for digestion 1.00
is digestion 0.92
be called site of digestion 0.87
be called as site of digestion 0.87
site of digestion 0.87
be well adapted for nutrient absorption 0.85
be adapted for absorption 0.84
be called site of complete digestion 0.84
be called as site of complete digestion 0.84
site of complete digestion 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ileum, be adapted for absorption)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(stomach, is digestion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(stomach, is digestion)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(stomach, is digestion)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ileum, be adapted for absorption)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ileum, be adapted for absorption)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(small intestine, be called site of digestion)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(small intestine, site of digestion)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(small intestine, be called as site of digestion)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(small intestine, be adapted for absorption)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(small intestine, site of complete digestion)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(small intestine, be called site of complete digestion)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(small intestine, be called as site of complete digestion)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(small intestine, site of digestion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(small intestine, be called site of digestion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(small intestine, site of digestion)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be called site of digestion)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(small intestine, be called as site of digestion)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be called as site of digestion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(small intestine, be adapted for absorption)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(small intestine, site of complete digestion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(small intestine, be called site of complete digestion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(small intestine, site of complete digestion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for absorption)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be called site of complete digestion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(small intestine, be called as site of complete digestion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be called as site of complete digestion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be called as site of digestion)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be called site of digestion)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be called as site of complete digestion)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, site of digestion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be called site of complete digestion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, site of complete digestion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for absorption)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(stomach, is digestion)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ileum, be adapted for absorption)