small intestine: be better adapted than thatof large intestine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.71
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.68
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.68
, large intestine
Weight: 0.65
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.67
, ileum
Weight: 0.47
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better adapted than thatof large intestine 1.00
be longer than large intestine 0.93
be longer than intestine 0.91
be longer than large intestines 0.88
be longer than intestines 0.86
be adapted for digestion 0.78
be different from complex tissues 0.77
be adapted help 0.77
be different from tissues 0.76
be convoluted inside abdominal cavity 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(tissue, be different from tissues)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tissue, be different from tissues)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be different from tissues)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stomach, be adapted help)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(tissue, be different from tissues)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(stomach, be adapted help)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(stomach, be adapted help)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than intestine)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer than large intestine)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than large intestine)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer than large intestine)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than intestines)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer than intestine)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than large intestines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer than large intestines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer than large intestines)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than large intestine)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer than intestine)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer than intestines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer than intestines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than large intestines)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than intestine)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than intestines)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tissue, be different from tissues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(stomach, be adapted help)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(small intestine, be better adapted than thatof large intestine)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tissue, be different from tissues)