small intestine: be efficient absorbing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.71
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.68
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.68
, large intestine
Weight: 0.65
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.67
, ileum
Weight: 0.47
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be efficient absorbing 1.00
be good absorbing 0.91
absorb water 0.77
be designed absorb 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(large intestine, absorb water)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tissue, absorb water)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tissue, absorb water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(large intestine, absorb water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tissue, absorb water)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(large intestine, absorb water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(large intestine, absorb water)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tissue, absorb water)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(small intestine, absorb water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(small intestine, absorb water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(small intestine, absorb water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(small intestine, be designed absorb)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(small intestine, be designed absorb)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be designed absorb)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, absorb water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be designed absorb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tissue, absorb water)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(large intestine, absorb water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tissue, absorb water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(large intestine, absorb water)