small intestine: be longer than carnivores

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.71
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.68
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.68
, large intestine
Weight: 0.65
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.67
, ileum
Weight: 0.47
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be longer than carnivores 1.00
be longer than than carnivores 0.99
be longer in carnivores 0.99
be in herbivores longer than in carnivores 0.95
be longer in herbivores in carnivores 0.94
be longer in herbivores 0.86
be larger in herbivores 0.82
be larger in carnivorous 0.78
be longer than large 0.77
is humans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, is humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(vascular tissue, is humans)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, is humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer in carnivores)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer in carnivores)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer in herbivores in carnivores)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than than carnivores)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(small intestine, be in herbivores longer than in carnivores)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer in herbivores in carnivores)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be larger in herbivores)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be in herbivores longer than in carnivores)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(small intestine, be larger in herbivores)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer in carnivores)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer in carnivores)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be larger in herbivores)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be in herbivores longer than in carnivores)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer than than carnivores)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(small intestine, be in herbivores longer than in carnivores)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer than than carnivores)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer in herbivores in carnivores)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(small intestine, be larger in herbivores)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer than large)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be larger in carnivorous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer than large)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(small intestine, be larger in carnivorous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer in herbivores in carnivores)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(small intestine, be larger in carnivorous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(small intestine, be longer in herbivores)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than large)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer in herbivores)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than large)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be longer in herbivores)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer in herbivores)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be larger in carnivorous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than than carnivores)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be longer than carnivores)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, is humans)