small intestine: be well adapted for nutrient absorption

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.71
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.68
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.68
, large intestine
Weight: 0.65
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.67
, ileum
Weight: 0.47
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be well adapted for nutrient absorption 1.00
be adapted for absorption 0.91
be adapted for digestion 0.85
absorb nutrients 0.83
obtain nutrients 0.80
be called as site of digestion 0.77
is digestion 0.77
produce different enzymes 0.76
be called site of digestion 0.76
be called as site of complete digestion 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ileum, be adapted for absorption)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stomach, produce different enzymes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(stomach, is digestion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ileum, be adapted for absorption)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ileum, be adapted for absorption)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(stomach, is digestion)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(stomach, is digestion)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(stomach, produce different enzymes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(stomach, produce different enzymes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(small intestine, be adapted for absorption)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(small intestine, be adapted for absorption)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for absorption)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(small intestine, absorb nutrients)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(small intestine, absorb nutrients)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(small intestine, absorb nutrients)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(small intestine, be called as site of digestion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(small intestine, produce different enzymes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(small intestine, be called site of digestion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(small intestine, be called as site of complete digestion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(small intestine, produce different enzymes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(small intestine, produce different enzymes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(small intestine, be called as site of digestion)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for absorption)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(small intestine, be called site of digestion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be called as site of digestion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(small intestine, be called as site of complete digestion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be called site of digestion)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be called as site of complete digestion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be adapted for digestion)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be called as site of digestion)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, absorb nutrients)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be called as site of complete digestion)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be called site of digestion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, produce different enzymes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(stomach, is digestion)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stomach, produce different enzymes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be well adapted for nutrient absorption)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ileum, be adapted for absorption)