smallpox: be good choice for bioterrorism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virus
Weight: 0.74
, infection
Weight: 0.67
, pathogen
Weight: 0.67
, vaccine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings influenza
Weight: 0.38
, computer virus
Weight: 0.37
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.37
, anthrax
Weight: 0.37
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good choice for bioterrorism 1.00
be considered bioterrorism agent 0.92
be considered high-priority bioterrorism agent 0.92
is bioterror 0.84
is bioterror threat 0.84
be called smallpox 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anthrax, be good choice for bioterrorism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(anthrax, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(anthrax, be good choice for bioterrorism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(smallpox, be considered bioterrorism agent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(smallpox, be considered high-priority bioterrorism agent)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(smallpox, is bioterror)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(smallpox, is bioterror threat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(smallpox, be considered high-priority bioterrorism agent)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(smallpox, be considered high-priority bioterrorism agent)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(smallpox, be considered bioterrorism agent)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(smallpox, is bioterror)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(smallpox, be considered bioterrorism agent)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(smallpox, is bioterror)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(smallpox, be called smallpox)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(smallpox, is bioterror threat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(smallpox, is bioterror threat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(smallpox, be called smallpox)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, be considered high-priority bioterrorism agent)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(smallpox, be called smallpox)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, be considered bioterrorism agent)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, is bioterror threat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, is bioterror)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, be called smallpox)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, be good choice for bioterrorism)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(anthrax, be good choice for bioterrorism)