smallpox: was first discovered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virus
Weight: 0.74
, infection
Weight: 0.67
, pathogen
Weight: 0.67
, vaccine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings influenza
Weight: 0.38
, computer virus
Weight: 0.37
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.37
, anthrax
Weight: 0.37
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was first discovered 1.00
was discovered 0.96
was created 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, was discovered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(influenza, was discovered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, was discovered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lyme disease, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, was discovered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(influenza, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(influenza, was discovered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chickenpox, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, was discovered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chickenpox, was created)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(smallpox, was first discovered)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(smallpox, was discovered)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(smallpox, was discovered)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(smallpox, was discovered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smallpox, was created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(smallpox, was created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smallpox, was created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was discovered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(smallpox, was first discovered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lyme disease, was discovered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(influenza, was discovered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chickenpox, was discovered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was first discovered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chickenpox, was created)