smart person: be intelligent

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.55
, genius
Weight: 0.54
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.33
, old woman
Weight: 0.33
, dead person
Weight: 0.33
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be intelligent 1.00
be bright or intelligent 0.90
be smart 0.83
smart man 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(genius, be smart)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(smart person, be intelligent)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(genius, be smart)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(genius, be smart)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(genius, be smart)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(smart person, be intelligent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(smart person, be intelligent)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(smart person, be bright or intelligent)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(smart person, be bright or intelligent)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(smart person, be bright or intelligent)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(smart person, be bright or intelligent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart person, be intelligent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(smart person, be intelligent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(genius, be smart)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(smart person, be intelligent)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(genius, be smart)