smartphone: be better than laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than laptops 1.00
be more expensive than laptops 0.96
cost more than laptops 0.94
be faster than computers 0.88
be considered computers 0.82
be better than flip phones 0.81
be better than iphones 0.80
be better than tablets 0.80
be more expensive than tablets 0.80
be better than chromebooks 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(android, be better than iphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(android, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(android, be better than iphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(android, be better than iphones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than chromebooks)