smartphone: be considered computers

Related concepts

Parents	mobile phone Weight: 0.70 , ipad Weight: 0.68 , web browser Weight: 0.67
Siblings	nokia Weight: 0.70 , blackberry Weight: 0.68 , android Weight: 0.64 , laptop computer Weight: 0.39 , cellular phone Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered computers	1.00
is computer	0.87
be faster than computers	0.86
be more expensive than laptops	0.82
be better than laptops	0.82
cost more than laptops	0.80
be considered technology	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered computers)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(smartphone, is computer)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered technology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(smartphone, is computer)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered technology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered technology)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered technology)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(smartphone, be considered computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)