smartphone: be faster than computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be faster than computers 1.00
be better than laptops 0.88
be more expensive than laptops 0.87
be considered computers 0.86
cost more than laptops 0.85
get slower 0.80
is computer 0.80
be better than chromebooks 0.79
be better than books 0.78
be more expensive than than tv 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get slower)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(smartphone, get slower)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(smartphone, is computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get slower)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(smartphone, get slower)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)