smartphone: be more expensive than laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than laptops 1.00
cost more than laptops 0.96
be better than laptops 0.96
be faster than computers 0.87
get more expensive 0.85
be more expensive than tablets 0.85
be more expensive than than tv 0.82
be considered computers 0.82
cost more than tablets 0.81
be cheaper than iphones 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)