smartphone: be more expensive than tablets

Related concepts

Parents	mobile phone Weight: 0.70 , ipad Weight: 0.68 , web browser Weight: 0.67
Siblings	nokia Weight: 0.70 , blackberry Weight: 0.68 , android Weight: 0.64 , laptop computer Weight: 0.39 , cellular phone Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than tablets	1.00
cost more than tablets	0.97
be better than tablets	0.96
be more expensive than laptops	0.85
cost more than laptops	0.82
get more expensive	0.80
be more expensive than than tv	0.80
be better than laptops	0.80
be cheaper than iphone	0.80
be cheaper than iphones	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphone)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than tablets)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(smartphone, get more expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphone)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)