smartphone: is computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is computer 1.00
be considered computers 0.87
be faster than computers 0.80
be better than laptops 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(smartphone, is computer)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(smartphone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)