smartphone: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
is harmful 0.79
be harmful to humans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(smartphone, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ipad, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(smartphone, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ipad, be harmful to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be harmful to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is dangerous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ipad, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(smartphone, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(smartphone, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ipad, be harmful to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ipad, be harmful to humans)