smell: be referred as chemical sense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, sensation
Weight: 0.62
, odor
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings smoke
Weight: 0.65
, taste
Weight: 0.34
, mildew
Weight: 0.33
, bad breath
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred as chemical sense 1.00
is chemical sense 0.91
is chemical senses 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, is chemical senses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, is chemical senses)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(taste, is chemical senses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(smell, be referred as chemical sense)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(smell, is chemical sense)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smell, is chemical sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(smell, is chemical sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(smell, is chemical senses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(smell, is chemical sense)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(smell, is chemical senses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(smell, is chemical senses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(smell, is chemical senses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(smell, be referred as chemical sense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(smell, be referred as chemical sense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, is chemical senses)