smog: be bad for air

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, carbon monoxide
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, acid rain
Weight: 0.34
, dust
Weight: 0.34
, mercury
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for air 1.00
has quality bad 0.79
be bad for environment 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dust, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for air)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for air)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for air)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mercury, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(acid rain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(acid rain, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acid rain, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dust, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(smog, be bad for air)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(smog, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(smog, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dust, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(acid rain, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smog, be bad for air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)