snack: be at movie

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.62
, salad
Weight: 0.59
, drink
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
Siblings candy bar
Weight: 0.73
, potato chip
Weight: 0.72
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.72
, pretzel
Weight: 0.71
, soft drink
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at movie 1.00
be at drive-in movie 1.00
be at theater 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be at movie)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at theater)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be at movie)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(candy bar, be at theater)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(candy bar, be at theater)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(snack, be at movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(snack, be at movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soft drink, be at movie)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(candy bar, be at theater)