snail: have baby

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, mollusk
Weight: 0.64
, insect
Weight: 0.63
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.62
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.38
, frog
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have baby 1.00
have babies 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have babies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, have babies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(tree frog, have babies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(lizard, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lizard, have babies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(caterpillar, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, have babies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(snail, have baby)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(snail, have babies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(snail, have babies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(snail, have babies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(snail, have babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snail, have baby)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(snail, have baby)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tree frog, have babies)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lizard, have babies)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snail, have baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(caterpillar, have babies)