snake: be at desert

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, predator
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.63
Siblings anaconda
Weight: 0.65
, gopher
Weight: 0.55
, cobra
Weight: 0.54
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.52
, lizard
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sonora desert 1.00
be at desert 1.00
be at desert country 0.96
be at jungle or desert 0.91
be at southern california desert 0.85
be at arid region 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at sonora desert)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at desert)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at southern california desert)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at arid region)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lizard, be at southern california desert)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at southern california desert)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(lizard, be at sonora desert)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at sonora desert)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lizard, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at desert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lizard, be at arid region)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at arid region)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(snake, be at desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(snake, be at desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lizard, be at desert)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lizard, be at sonora desert)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, be at southern california desert)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lizard, be at arid region)