snake: be at glass enclose case

Related concepts

Parents	reptile Weight: 0.70 , creature Weight: 0.70 , predator Weight: 0.69 , pet Weight: 0.69 , animal Weight: 0.63
Siblings	anaconda Weight: 0.65 , gopher Weight: 0.55 , cobra Weight: 0.54 , kangaroo rat Weight: 0.52 , lizard Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at glass enclose case	1.00
be at glass cage	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(snake, be at glass enclose case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at glass cage)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(snake, be at glass enclose case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(lizard, be at glass cage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(lizard, be at glass cage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(snake, be at glass enclose case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(snake, be at glass enclose case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(snake, be at glass enclose case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(snake, be at glass enclose case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(snake, be at glass enclose case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(snake, be at glass enclose case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(snake, be at glass enclose case)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(snake, be at glass enclose case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(lizard, be at glass cage)