snake: be at hole

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, predator
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.63
Siblings anaconda
Weight: 0.65
, gopher
Weight: 0.55
, cobra
Weight: 0.54
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.52
, lizard
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hole 1.00
be at hole in rock 0.90
be at hole in grind 0.90
be at small hole in grind 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at hole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(snake, be at hole)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(snake, be at hole in rock)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(snake, be at hole in grind)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(snake, be at hole in grind)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in grind)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(snake, be at hole in grind)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(snake, be at hole in rock)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(snake, be at hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lizard, be at hole)