snake: be at hole in rock

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, predator
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.63
Siblings anaconda
Weight: 0.65
, gopher
Weight: 0.55
, cobra
Weight: 0.54
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.52
, lizard
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hole in rock 1.00
be at hole 0.90
be at rock 0.89
be at rock wall 0.87
be at hole in grind 0.86
be at small hole in grind 0.85
be at field under rock 0.83
sun on rock 0.80
sun themselves on rock 0.77
be at rock catch sun bath 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at rock)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at rock wall)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at field under rock)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lizard, sun on rock)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at hole)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lizard, be at rock wall)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at rock wall)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lizard, sun on rock)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lizard, sun on rock)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lizard, be at rock)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at rock)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lizard, be at field under rock)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at field under rock)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(snake, be at hole in rock)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(snake, be at hole)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(snake, be at hole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(snake, be at hole in grind)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(snake, be at hole in grind)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in grind)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(snake, be at hole in grind)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(snake, be at hole)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(snake, be at hole in rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lizard, be at hole)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lizard, be at rock)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lizard, be at rock wall)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lizard, sun on rock)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at hole in rock)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lizard, be at field under rock)