sneaker: be in style

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, style
Weight: 0.53
Siblings converse
Weight: 0.47
, nike
Weight: 0.33
, loafer
Weight: 0.33
, sock
Weight: 0.32
, jeans
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in style 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, be in style)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(jeans, be in style)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sneaker, be in style)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(jeans, be in style)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(jeans, be in style)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sneaker, be in style)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sneaker, be in style)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sneaker, be in style)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sneaker, be in style)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, be in style)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sneaker, be in style)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sneaker, be in style)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, be in style)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(jeans, be in style)