snoring: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.54
, breathing
Weight: 0.53
, sound
Weight: 0.53
, noise
Weight: 0.52
, symptom
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sleep apnea
Weight: 0.68
, insomnia
Weight: 0.33
, loud noise
Weight: 0.32
, angina
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state problems 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sleep apnea, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(insomnia, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(insomnia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(insomnia, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sleep apnea, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sleep apnea, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(snoring, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(snoring, has state problems)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(snoring, has state problems)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(snoring, has state problems)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has state problems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(snoring, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sleep apnea, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(insomnia, has state problem)