snowflake: be used to be pretty

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crystal
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, design
Weight: 0.56
, shape
Weight: 0.53
, pattern
Weight: 0.52
Siblings ice cube
Weight: 0.33
, snowman
Weight: 0.33
, raindrop
Weight: 0.32
, flower arrangement
Weight: 0.32
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to be pretty 1.00
be pretty 0.99
be very light 0.77
be useless but still enjoyable 0.75
do not work well 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(snowflake, be used to be pretty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(snowflake, be used to be pretty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(snowflake, be used to be pretty)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(snowflake, be pretty)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, be pretty)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(snowflake, be pretty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(snowflake, be pretty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, be very light)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(snowflake, be very light)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(snowflake, be very light)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(snowflake, be very light)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(snowflake, be used to be pretty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(snowflake, be used to be pretty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)