snowy owl: be endangered because of climate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents owl
Weight: 0.75
, bird
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.70
, wildlife
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.63
Siblings barn owl
Weight: 0.40
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.39
, snow goose
Weight: 0.39
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.39
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be endangered because of climate 1.00
is endangered 0.86
become endangered 0.84
be on endangered list 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(owl, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wildlife, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(owl, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, become endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, become endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is endangered)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(species, become endangered)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(owl, is endangered)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, become endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(barn owl, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, become endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(owl, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wildlife, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arctic fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(great horned owl, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(barn owl, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(barn owl, is endangered)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(arctic fox, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, become endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(snowy owl, is endangered)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(snowy owl, is endangered)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(snowy owl, become endangered)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(snowy owl, become endangered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, is endangered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, become endangered)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(snowy owl, be on endangered list)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be on endangered list)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be on endangered list)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, is endangered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, become endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be on endangered list)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(species, become endangered)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wildlife, is endangered)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(owl, is endangered)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(owl, be on endangered list)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(arctic fox, become endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(barn owl, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wildlife, is endangered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(owl, is endangered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(species, become endangered)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(snowy owl, be endangered because of climate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(owl, be on endangered list)