soccer field: be at town

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.66
, playground
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.59
, community
Weight: 0.59
Siblings baseball field
Weight: 0.84
, football field
Weight: 0.41
, football team
Weight: 0.37
, soccer
Weight: 0.37
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at town 1.00
be part of town 0.95
be at city 0.85
be at rural area 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(community, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at town)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(field, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at town)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at town)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(area, be part of town)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(field, be at rural area)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(community, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(community, be at city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(field, be at rural area)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(football field, be at city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at town)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(community, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(field, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at town)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(football field, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(football field, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(soccer field, be at town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(area, be part of town)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(community, be at city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(field, be at rural area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(football field, be at city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(area, be part of town)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(community, be at city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(field, be at rural area)