socialism: be less efficient than capitalism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ideology
Weight: 0.72
, political ideology
Weight: 0.70
, movement
Weight: 0.66
, evil
Weight: 0.66
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.40
, liberalism
Weight: 0.39
, communism
Weight: 0.38
, anarchism
Weight: 0.38
, nationalism
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less efficient than capitalism 1.00
be better than capitalism 0.94
be worse than capitalism 0.90
be different from capitalism 0.88
be similar to capitalism 0.87
was similar to capitalism 0.87
differ from capitalism 0.84
provide compromise between capitalism 0.81
be better than communism 0.81
differs from capitalism 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be better than communism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(capitalism, be better than communism)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be better than communism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(socialism, was similar to capitalism)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(socialism, be similar to capitalism)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(socialism, differ from capitalism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(socialism, be better than capitalism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(socialism, differs from capitalism)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(socialism, be different from capitalism)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(socialism, be worse than capitalism)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be worse than capitalism)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(socialism, be worse than capitalism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(socialism, was similar to capitalism)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(socialism, be similar to capitalism)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(socialism, differ from capitalism)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(socialism, be better than communism)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(socialism, be worse than capitalism)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(socialism, be better than capitalism)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(socialism, be different from capitalism)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(socialism, provide compromise between capitalism)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(socialism, differs from capitalism)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(socialism, provide compromise between capitalism)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(socialism, provide compromise between capitalism)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(socialism, be better than communism)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(socialism, be different from capitalism)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(socialism, be similar to capitalism)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(socialism, be better than capitalism)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(socialism, was similar to capitalism)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(socialism, differ from capitalism)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(socialism, differs from capitalism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be better than capitalism)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(socialism, provide compromise between capitalism)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be different from capitalism)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(socialism, be better than communism)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be similar to capitalism)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(socialism, was similar to capitalism)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(socialism, differ from capitalism)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be better than communism)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(socialism, differs from capitalism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be less efficient than capitalism)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(capitalism, be better than communism)