socket: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanism
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, receptacle
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings rmi
Weight: 0.36
, acetabulum
Weight: 0.34
, toaster
Weight: 0.33
, bulb
Weight: 0.33
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is bad now 0.84
has quality worth 0.82
taste bad 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
go bad 0.79
be bad for game 0.78
be considered bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(socket, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(socket, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(socket, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(toaster, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(bulb, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(toaster, be considered bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(socket, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(toaster, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(toaster, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(bulb, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bulb, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(toaster, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(toaster, be considered bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(socket, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(socket, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(socket, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(socket, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(socket, is bad now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(socket, is bad now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(socket, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(socket, is bad now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(socket, is bad now)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(socket, taste bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(socket, taste bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(socket, has quality worth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(socket, taste bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(socket, taste bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(socket, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality worth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(socket, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(socket, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(toaster, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bulb, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(toaster, be considered bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(socket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)