soda: be more expensive than water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.73
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.73
, item
Weight: 0.67
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, substance
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mountain dew
Weight: 0.59
, soda pop
Weight: 0.41
, cola
Weight: 0.38
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than water 1.00
be cheaper than water 0.93
be more refreshing than water 0.84
be cheaper than bottled water 0.83
be thicker than water 0.83
better than salt 0.80
be better than juice 0.79
be worse than juice 0.79
be better than dark 0.78
have more pressure than vinegar 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(soda, be more expensive than water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cola, be cheaper than water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(soda, be more expensive than water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(soda, be more expensive than water)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(soda, be thicker than water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(soda, be thicker than water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(soda, be more refreshing than water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(soda, be more refreshing than water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(soda, be more refreshing than water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(soda, be thicker than water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(soda, be thicker than water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(soda, be more refreshing than water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(soda, be more expensive than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soda, be more expensive than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)