soft drink: be bad for patients

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for patients 1.00
be bad for orthodontic patients 0.84
be bad for health 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for patients)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for orthodontic patients)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for orthodontic patients)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for orthodontic patients)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for orthodontic patients)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for patients)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for patients)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for patients)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad for health)