soft drink: be cheaper than water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than water 1.00
is expensive 0.82
be used as cleaner 0.77
is cheap 0.77
is quicker 0.77
be lighter than normal coke 0.76
be less dense than regular 0.76
be less dense than coke 0.76
go higher drpepper 0.76
be better than orange juice 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be lighter than normal coke)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be better than orange juice)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be less dense than regular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be less dense than coke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(diet coke, be less dense than coke)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be less dense than coke)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(diet coke, be less dense than regular)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be less dense than regular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, be better than orange juice)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be better than orange juice)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(orange juice, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(orange juice, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(apple juice, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is cheap)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(diet coke, be lighter than normal coke)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be lighter than normal coke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(soft drink, be cheaper than water)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be used as cleaner)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(soft drink, be used as cleaner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(soft drink, be used as cleaner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be used as cleaner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(soft drink, is quicker)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is cheap)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is quicker)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is quicker)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soft drink, is cheap)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(soft drink, is quicker)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(soft drink, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(soft drink, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diet coke, be less dense than coke)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(diet coke, be less dense than regular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(apple juice, be better than orange juice)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(diet coke, be lighter than normal coke)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(orange juice, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple juice, is cheap)