soft drink: be expensive in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in australia 1.00
be expensive in europe 0.83
be expensive in italy 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be expensive in australia)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be expensive in australia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be expensive in europe)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be expensive in europe)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(coca cola, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be expensive in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bottled water, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be expensive in australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coca cola, be expensive in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bottled water, be expensive in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be expensive in europe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(soft drink, be expensive in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in europe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in italy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(soft drink, be expensive in italy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in italy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(soft drink, be expensive in europe)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in italy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coca cola, be expensive in australia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, be expensive in australia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, be expensive in europe)