soft drink: be expensive in restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in restaurants 1.00
be expensive in pubs 0.80
is expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(orange juice, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(orange juice, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in pubs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in pubs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(soft drink, be expensive in pubs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in pubs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(soft drink, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(orange juice, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is expensive)