softball: be played differently

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.62
, sport
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, volleyball
Weight: 0.54
Siblings softball game
Weight: 0.38
, baseball game
Weight: 0.37
, baseball team
Weight: 0.37
, hockey game
Weight: 0.37
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be played differently 1.00
be played 0.85
be played with bigger ball 0.82
be good game play 0.81
be played with ball 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(volleyball, be played)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(softball, be played differently)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(volleyball, be played)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, be played)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(volleyball, be played)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(softball, be played differently)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(softball, be played differently)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(softball, be played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(softball, be played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(softball, be played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(softball, be played with ball)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(softball, be played with bigger ball)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(softball, be played with ball)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(softball, be played with bigger ball)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(softball, be played with ball)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(softball, be played with bigger ball)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(softball, be good game play)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(softball, be good game play)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(softball, be good game play)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(softball, be good game play)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(softball, be played with bigger ball)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(softball, be played)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(softball, be played with ball)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(softball, be played differently)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(softball, be played differently)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(volleyball, be played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(softball, be played differently)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(volleyball, be played)