softball: is different sizes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.62
, sport
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, volleyball
Weight: 0.54
Siblings softball game
Weight: 0.38
, baseball game
Weight: 0.37
, baseball team
Weight: 0.37
, hockey game
Weight: 0.37
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is different sizes 1.00
is sizes 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, is different sizes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, is sizes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(soccer ball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, is different sizes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(soccer ball, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, is sizes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(softball, is different sizes)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(softball, is sizes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(softball, is sizes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(softball, is sizes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(softball, is sizes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(softball, is different sizes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(softball, is different sizes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(soccer ball, is different sizes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(softball, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soccer ball, is sizes)