software: be more important than hardware

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents software company
Weight: 0.74
, computer program
Weight: 0.70
, module
Weight: 0.67
, code
Weight: 0.65
Siblings browser
Weight: 0.75
, computer game
Weight: 0.75
, free software
Weight: 0.74
, freeware
Weight: 0.70
, source code
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than hardware 1.00
be more expensive than hardware 0.97
actually make hardware work 0.91
affect hardware 0.90
works in hardware 0.87
connect with hardware 0.85
behave like hardware 0.85
communicate to hardware 0.84
interact with hardware 0.84
differ from hardware 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(code, behave like hardware)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(software, be more important than hardware)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(code, behave like hardware)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(code, behave like hardware)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(code, behave like hardware)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(software, be more important than hardware)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(software, actually make hardware work)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(software, affect hardware)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(software, affect hardware)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(software, connect with hardware)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(software, works in hardware)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(software, interact with hardware)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(software, differ from hardware)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(software, communicate to hardware)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(software, connect with hardware)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(software, interact with hardware)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(software, differ from hardware)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(software, works in hardware)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(software, actually make hardware work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(software, affect hardware)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(software, connect with hardware)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(software, affect hardware)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(software, differ from hardware)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(software, interact with hardware)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(software, differ from hardware)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(software, connect with hardware)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(software, interact with hardware)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(software, works in hardware)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(software, works in hardware)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(software, communicate to hardware)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(software, communicate to hardware)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(software, communicate to hardware)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(software, actually make hardware work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(software, actually make hardware work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(software, be more important than hardware)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(code, behave like hardware)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(code, behave like hardware)