software: is quality product

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents software company
Weight: 0.74
, computer program
Weight: 0.70
, module
Weight: 0.67
, code
Weight: 0.65
Siblings browser
Weight: 0.75
, computer game
Weight: 0.75
, free software
Weight: 0.74
, freeware
Weight: 0.70
, source code
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality product 1.00
is product 0.95
needs quality product 0.92
has quality system 0.79
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(computer program, is product)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(software company, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(software company, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer program, is product)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(code, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(code, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer program, is product)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer game, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer game, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freeware, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(computer program, is product)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(software company, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(software company, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(freeware, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(freeware, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(source code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer game, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(source code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer game, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(computer game, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(software, is quality product)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(software, needs quality product)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(software, needs quality product)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(software, needs quality product)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(software, needs quality product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer program, is product)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality system)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(software company, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(freeware, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(computer game, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(computer game, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer program, is product)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(software company, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(software, is quality product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)