sol: be considered best little mac player

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, brand
Weight: 0.46
, artist
Weight: 0.46
, beer
Weight: 0.45
Siblings cd player
Weight: 0.31
, puerto rican
Weight: 0.30
, cd rom
Weight: 0.30
, el nino
Weight: 0.30
, florence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered best little mac player 1.00
be considered little mac player 0.98
be considered best mac player 0.98
be considered mac player 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sol, be considered best little mac player)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sol, be considered little mac player)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sol, be considered little mac player)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sol, be considered little mac player)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sol, be considered mac player)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(sol, be considered mac player)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sol, be considered mac player)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sol, be considered best mac player)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sol, be considered best mac player)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sol, be considered best mac player)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sol, be considered mac player)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sol, be considered little mac player)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sol, be considered best mac player)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sol, be considered best little mac player)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sol, be considered best little mac player)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sol, be considered best little mac player)