solar cell: be similar in function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.70
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, electronics
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings inverter
Weight: 0.36
, electric motor
Weight: 0.35
, antenna
Weight: 0.35
, diode
Weight: 0.35
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar in function 1.00
be similar 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(system, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(solar cell, be similar in function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(system, be similar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(system, be similar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(system, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(solar cell, be similar in function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(solar cell, be similar in function)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be similar)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(solar cell, be similar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(solar cell, be similar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(solar cell, be similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be similar in function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(solar cell, be similar in function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(system, be similar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(solar cell, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(system, be similar)